Foreword by Deyan Sudjic
Birds Portchmouth Russum

Foreword by Deyan Sudjic


Few architects ever manage to develop a voice that is distinctly their own. No matter how long their careers, they go on struggling to find something to say with their architecture, but rarely get beyond the most basic vocabulary of pragmatic functionalism or borrowed clothes.
Birds Portchmouth Russum are different. They began their practice relatively recently having won a competition for a new parking structure in a particularly sensitive part of Chichester’s town centre in 1989. With that first major commission it was immediately clear that they were offering an approach to architecture that was fresh, strong and highly original. It is an approach that is concerned with far more than simply personal preoccupations, but offers pointers for the direction that architecture is likely to take as the current nostrum’s lose their appeal through continued repetition.
Their work has nothing to do with revival-ism, but it does suggest that architecture needs a sense of memory and offers an interpretation of modernity that is neither oversimplified, nor naive. The designs are always inventive, always attempting to define new archetypes, and continually ready to look for inspiration in any direction, from the wildly visionary to the technological, and the soberly evocative.

The most everyday and banal of material, even a car park, or a suburban railway station is transformed into something with presence and character. Their designs combine a surrealistic sense of experimentation in form, colour and imagery, with a rigorous and intelligent approach to planning and detail. It has an essentially English quality in tune with the tradition of Hawksmoor, Soane, Butterfield and Burges.

There is a sense in the work of an enjoyment in the process of exploring a variety of approaches to architecture in the very different projects they have undertaken. Participating in the Croydon urban initiative to look at ways of redefining the threadbare utilitarianism of its 1960’s buildings, they produced playful and literally fantastic high tech gymnastics, involving inflatable structures, laser beams and showy flamboyance. This was work that was provocative, but which nevertheless engaged with the context for which it was designed, and offered genuine insights for dealing with the time expired relics of the period. Yet the Stonehenge Visitors Centre offered Britain’s most moving archeological monument a suitably dignified setting.
This was a design that rose to a sublime setting, with an appropriately powerful response, and yet did so in such a way that the integrity of Stonehenge remained inviolate. At a time when the universal uninflected space had never been more prevalent, their work was characterised by a renewed focus

 

awards

Deyan Sudjuc
foreword

articles 1992-2002

articles 2002-pres

books 2002-2005

 

 

practice

summary

partners

awards & pubications

profile